Is it just me, or is anyone else concerned by the overwhelming consensus that the opening of Primark in Derby will single-handedly kick-start the Cathedral Quarter revolution?
The budget clothing chain opened its new Derby store today with many seemingly convinced that its presence will magically address the huge imbalance created by Westfield Derby. Well, I’ll tell you now, it won’t.

I know, I know...I shouldn't be so negative. I guess that at least it's another step in the right direction for the ‘other end’ of Derby, but it’s clear that the area’s regeneration and redefinition will take some time. We should be thankful for small mercies though and at least there’s some sign that things are starting to happen.
Despite last week’s news that Tesco had pulled out of a deal to buy the still-disappointingly-derelict Debenham’s building on Victoria Street, I can’t help but think that it was a blessing in disguise. Would we really want a Tesco megastore in the city centre? The issue, however, is finding any other retailer has the buying power and stock diversity to fill such a mammoth building. It ain't going to be easy.

The biggest problem I have with The Cathedral Quarter is that I’m not sure I quite understand its scope. Does anyone know where it officially starts and ends? And where does ‘The Lanes’ fit it to all this? Answers on a postcard please.
1 comment:
In my humble opinion, I’ve so far seen very little of what the so-called (and actually titled) "cathedral quarter" has brought to the city centre, other than the promise of promising times ahead. I’m still waiting.
Having lived in Derby all of my life, it upsets me to see so many smaller and even medium-sized businesses around the Sadlergate, Iron Gate and Cheapside area closing down, leaving behind empty shops and quiet side-streets.
The council knew for a long time that the Westfield centre was on its way, so why after nine months since it was opened have we so far seen very little change the other end of town?!?
Post a Comment